Skip to content

Settings and activity

4 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Michael Mardahl shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Michael Mardahl shared this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael Mardahl commented  · 

    Enhanced bounce handling for Exchange Online recipients.

    Currently it seems that even if a recipient no longer exists in Exchange Online, it will many times just register as a Soft-Bounce.
    Since Exchange Online is a huge system, I suggest spending more time on doing specific regular expression checks against the bounce messages that come from Microsoft. This way the service improves for all of us :)

    Michael Mardahl supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael Mardahl commented  · 

    Support multiple owners on premium and custom plans.

    With IT security becoming a global concern and countries enforcing government institutions and large companies to apply ISO certification by law, I think you should make it possible to have multiple owners of an account.

    Currently there is only one owner, and sub accounts can be created to share access.

    But it is naïve to think that companies will have just one IT guy managing this.
    And with any good compliance framework, there is a requirement that all employees with access to a system like mailjet, must have a personal account.

    So in my case, it would mean we are a team of 10 people who manage access to e-mail systems, and we should not share the owner account, because that gives us trouble if someone leave the company and we forget to change the password for the shared account. or if someone does something bad, and we cant tell which of the 10 people did it, because they had to share an account to be able to get their work done.

    So, please, support having multiple owners, it is a true enterprise MUST have. and a selling point.

    Michael Mardahl supported this idea  ·