Skip to content

Settings and activity

7 results found

  1. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vilius commented  · 

    I would like to propose a change, that blocking due to hard-bounce should start from 2nd or 3rd bounce per recipient, instead of 1st hard-bounce like it is now. This is needed because sometimes recipient servers return hard-bounce because of *temporary* misconfiguration or other reasons. For example, recipient servers could have a mailbox migration in progress which temporary makes some mailboxes returning "unknown mailbox" error.
    2-3 retries would still protect sender spam score and would eliminate the need to contact Mailjet support every time there is a flick on recipients end.

    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  3. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  5. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  6. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vilius commented  · 

    I concur. Logging in into Mailjet dashboard is a pain. Please use standards such as NIST and allow users to specify long but not complicated passwords.
    Also, please add proper 2FA support with security key, such as Yubikey.

    Vilius supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vilius supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vilius commented  · 

    It would be great if Mailjet UI could show the exact SMTP error code and response when hard-bounce or soft-bounce occurs. This information is crucial to understand why bounce occurred. For example current for "500 5.4.1 Access Denied" response UI reports just "Connection failure" which is not very descriptive.